Vision
“To support the potential of all
aquatic athletes in Sussex and to ensure that the
most talented have access to the necessary support”.
Introduction
To realise this vision I have again
tried to ensure that the Development Plan:
-
Engages with different groups in
a way that is appropriate for them.
-
Uses our resources as efficiently
as possible;
-
Continues to support the
organisation to move from being character led to
becoming function led, and;
-
Establishes clear lines of
responsibility and empowers individuals.
These ‘golden threads’ should be
behind each and every action. In this Development
Plan I have tried to achieve this by identifying
clear aims for each section.
The central thrust of this
development plan is to continue to the work bringing
together the different facets of the organisation
into a single organic body. I have again tried to
take a whole sport approach and wherever possible
remove barriers between disciplines and open
opportunities to as wide a group as possible.
We need to work in a different way if
we hope to deliver better value and be valued more
by clubs and swimmers.
The 2012/13 Development Plan was year
1 of a two year rolling programme – I had envisaged
that in 2013/14 we would be reviewing undelivered or
incomplete schemes of work from 12/13 before
developing this Plan. Unfortunately I have not
received any feedback on the effectiveness of the
Plan and have therefore not been able to reflect on
comments.
I have developed reporting templates
that will need to be used if we are going to be able
to manage, monitor and report on the development
plan and its related budgets.
Summary of the plan
One of the challenges with setting an
ambitious programme is to avoid it becoming onerous
and failing to meet expectations. To avoid this I
have again tried to reduce the number of fixed
points and instead create a structure that should be
the basis behind our decision making. My objective
has been to try to identify why we do what we do and
ensure that what we do, we do better.
Each
section of the plan is devolved to clearly
identified ownership and therefore accountability.
These ‘owners’ are often in more than one group and
includes the county Aquatics Officer.
This
mechanism will ensure a greater spread of knowledge
and experience.
I
have tried to ensure that each measure flows
naturally to the next and therefore delivery is more
efficient and streamlined. Having said that the plan
still relies on volunteers – there is a huge
capability in the county and we need to engage with
it, something that we have started and must continue
to do.
There will be members of our community that do not
want to face change but if we are going to support
our athletes we are not going to be able to ignore
the environment around us – either economically,
socially or politically. We need to change to meet
these challenges and expectations.
Sponsorship
We
are a successful organisation. We attract an
audience from across Sussex and from all sections of
its community. As an organisation we play a key role
in supporting a range of governmental, sporting,
educational and social objectives, including:
-
Healthy lifestyles;
-
Life long skills;
-
Social inclusion, and;
-
Safe communities.
We
have a positive image and strong brand with clear
relationships to high profile events and nationally
recognised personalities.
These factors mean that we are well placed to
attract sponsorship capable of giving us the support
that we need to deliver on ambitious development
plans in future years. We need to capitalise on
these opportunities and establish committed
partnerships.
Key
points for 2013/14
1.
The review of committees, their roles and
responsibilities needs to be completed.
2.
Given the difficulties incurred prior to the Masters
Championships 2012 I would like to see the formal
structuring of a Competitions Delivery Group to
oversee the delivery of all county
competitions. The recruitment of volunteers to take
on the roles of Technical Secretaries should not be
conditional on their ability to deliver a
competition. Similarly the expertise that has been
developed in the county to deliver quality
competitions needs to be more widely available. The
formation of a CDG, included in this plan as item
4.1, would address these points.
3.
I am proposing that the management of all swimming
squads, training camps and events is through the
Swimming Hon Sec – delegating to a group that would
include the county coach (s). The budgets associated
with these activities sits within the swimming
committee budgets and should be managed by that
group.
4.
I am hoping that everyone involved in delivering
this development plan will seek to identify and
develop opportunities that will engage and value
experienced athletes so that they remain committed
to the county and to the sport whether as athletes,
teaches, administrators or officials. Only in this
way will the county have long-term sustainability.
Key to abbreviations used in this
Development Plan
|
AO |
Aquatics Officer |
|
MC |
Management Committee |
|
CC |
County Coach |
|
MsS |
Masters Hon Sec |
|
CDG |
Competition Delivery Group |
|
OwS |
Open Water Hon Sec |
|
Comts |
Committees |
|
RD |
Regional Director |
|
DevS |
Development Hon Secretary |
|
SwS |
Swimming Hon Sec |
|
DsS |
Disabilities Hon Secretary |
|
Trs |
County Hon Treasurer |
|
DvS |
Diving Hon Sec |
|
WfC |
Workforce co-ordinator |
|
|
|
|
WpS |
Water polo Hon Sec |
Click
Here to
View or Print Plan
The role of the
Aquatics Officer is still unclear but it is
expected that some of the role, when clarified,
will support the work of SCASA
Brian DeVal
Honorary Development Secretary
20 March 2013